Neuro-Literacy Campus
Schools in Melbourne, Accra, and Vancouver implemented BCI dashboards that help educators adapt lessons based on student attention, stress, and curiosity markers. The program champions neuroinclusive feedback that transforms STEM engagement.
Learners
7,400 students
Educators
312 trained mentors
Signals
EEG · Eye-tracking
Program Narrative
Students wear flexible headbands during opt-in sessions that gauge attention windows and cognitive load. Educators receive dashboards highlighting when to pause, differentiate instruction, or introduce sensory breaks. Collaboratively, classes design knowledge maps that reflect how curiosity spreads across peers.
Core Elements
- ● Open-source lesson templating with neurofeedback checkpoints.
- ● Student agency settings allowing granular control of when signals are shared.
- ● Peer ambassador program training learners to facilitate inclusive tech use.
- ● Guardians portal offering narratives and strategies instead of raw data.
Impact Highlights
STEM Engagement
+34%
Increase in project-based learning participation.
Well-Being
-21%
Reduction in reported classroom overwhelm.
Retention
92%
Students opting to continue in advanced electives.
Ethical Practice
BCICaseLab worked with educational psychologists to codify neurodata rights tailored for minors. Schools operate a cooperative governance board with parents, caregivers, and students. No high-stakes decisions rely solely on neural analytics; instead, data informs dialogue and supportive interventions.
Consent: Opt-in windows appear before each session with plain-language context.
Privacy: Local processing anonymizes signals prior to class summaries.
Equity: Schools allocate resources to ensure students can choose non-BCI pathways without disadvantage.
Expansion Plans
Future cohorts will co-develop neuro-literacy curricula with open educational resource partners. Dedicated mentorship circles help students learn how to question AI outputs, encouraging critical thinking and agency in emerging neurotech landscapes.